REVIEW: “Beetlejuice Beetlejuice” (2024)


WRITER’S NOTE: The following was originally posted on my Facebook page on September 9, 2024. 

In the same category as other long-awaited sequels released decades after their respective predecessors (Mad Max: Fury Road and Top Gun: Maverick, anybody?), director Tim Burton returns to his roots with the much-anticipated follow-up to his 1988 supernatural horror-comedy Beetlejuice. Michael Keaton is back as the titular “trickster demon” (“The Juice is loose”), as are Winona Ryder and Catherine O’Hara (as goth girl-turned-paranormal TV show host Lydia Deetz and her eccentric, artsy stepmother Delia, respectively). Joining them are Jenna Ortega (as Lydia’s moody teenage daughter Astrid), and Justin Thoreaux (as Lydia’s TV producer/beau), in a story that follows three generations of the Deetz family returning to the sleepy town of Winter River, Connecticut, for a patriarch’s funeral (two days before Halloween, no less). Then, when Astrid mistakenly ends up in the Neitherworld (this franchise’s version of the afterlife), Lydia reluctantly calls on the infamous “bio-exorcist” to find her daughter and bring her home. 

Like the aforementioned tentpoles (and last year’s Barbie and Oppenheimer), Beetlejuice Beetlejuice relies heavily on practical effects and large-scale set pieces, including unique stop-motion creatures (who could forget those giant sandworms?) and a wildly absurd and darkly comic atmosphere. Burton has said that working on this movie (as well as the Netflix series Wednesday) reinvigorated his love for filmmaking. It shows, and not just through the eye-popping and colorful production design and art direction. 

Likewise, Keaton is clearly having a ball with his iconic and electric role; ditto Willem Dafoe as a former movie star-turned-private eye. In fact, the whole cast (“Bob” included) is certainly terrific. It should also be noted that screenwriters Alfred Gough and Miles Miller have a knack for reinventing classic franchises. (Remember Smallville and Spider-Man 2?) They help give the unpredictable plot an unexpectedly (and strange) emotional core, with character-driven arcs about rekindling familial bonds and believing in what is unseen. 

The thing is, Beetlejuice Beetlejuice feels like an overall lackluster (and fast-paced) outcome, and doesn’t quite leave the same lasting impression that the first movie did. It would be hard to top the “Day-O” dinner scene from the original. That’s not to say the new movie has its moments. (That “couple’s therapy” scene is crazy and unhinged.) 

More importantly, while the new film’s cartoonish nature isn’t meant to be taken seriously, its spiritual influence—passive, misguided, and problematic—should be. A subplot involves a “soul-sucking demon” woman (Monica Bellucci) with a personal bone to pick with the Juice—and who literally staples herself together. Then there’s the 70s-inspired “Soul Train,” along with visual (macabre) gags referring to various forms of demise. But the way the movie treats eternal damnation as a joke is deeply disturbing. Did I mention there’s a creepy baby as well? Like this year’s Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire, this legacy sequel may make some fans (and general moviegoers) question if it was worth the wait. 

#filmfreeq #bekerianreviews #21stcenturycinema #warnerbros #geffencompany #timburton #beetlejuicebeetlejuice2024

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

REVIEW: “The Substance” (2024)

REVIEW: “Sing Sing” (2024)

REVIEW: “Transformers One” (2024)